Richard’s Genealogy
Jane Judd
Est 1785 -Set As Default Person
-
Name Jane Judd Gender Female Born Est 1785 Wherwell, Hampshire, England Person ID I5280 Richard's Genealogy Last Modified 30 Apr 2021
Family David Wooden, bp. 14 May 1780, Alton Priors, Wiltshire, England , bur. 7 Aug 1865, Tichborne, Hampshire, England (Age ~ 85 years) Married 12 Dec 1807 Littleton, Hampshire, England [1] Children 1. Stephen Wooden, b. 31 May 1809, d. 1878, South Stoneham district, Hampshire, England (Age 68 years) + 2. Martha Wooden, b. 17 May 1811 3. Jane Wooden, bp. 28 Mar 1813, Tichborne, Hampshire, England + 4. Mary Wooden, bp. 30 Apr 1814, Tichborne, Hampshire, England , d. 1878, South Stoneham district, Hampshire, England (Age ~ 63 years) 5. Fanny Wooden, bp. 10 Jan 1816, Tichborne, Hampshire, England , bur. 4 May 1816, Tichborne, Hampshire, England (Age ~ 0 years) 6. Thomas Wooden, bp. 20 Aug 1817, Tichborne, Hampshire, England 7. David Wooden, bp. 9 Oct 1819, Tichborne, Hampshire, England 8. Sarah Wooden, bp. 5 Jan 1822, Tichborne, Hampshire, England + 9. John Wooden, bp. 17 Jan 1824, Tichborne, Hampshire, England , d. 1902, Havant district, Hampshire, England (Age ~ 77 years) + 10. Joseph Wooden, bp. 27 Mar 1829, Tichborne, Hampshire, England Last Modified 30 Apr 2021 Family ID F1363 Group Sheet | Family Chart
-
Notes - The 1861 census says Jane was aged 86 and born in Wherwell, Hants; however, the 1851 census says she was 61 and born in what looks like Horrell, Hants. This could make her born in 1775 or 1790. As she married in 1807, the latter is only slightly implausible; the former makes her 54 when Joseph was born which is impossible. Based on when her children were born, a birth in the 1780s seems most likely.
David's age on the 1851 census is also suspect. It says 79, while the 1861 census says 81, and his 1865 burial says 87. This suggests a birth in the late 1770s. His baptism was in 1780, so the 1851 census seems the less accurate.
The HGS index has no Jane Judd baptised in the 1780s. The closest is a Jane Judd baptised Nov 1778 in Broughton, daughter of Samuel and Anne. This would make her 48 when Joseph was born which is just about feasible. What's more, Broughton is close to Wherwell. However Samuel and Anne had another daughter, Jane, baptised in 1793, and the earlier Jane was probably the Jane Judd buried in 1784. A 1793 birth is implausibly young, though it's possible she was several years old when she was baptised.
- The 1861 census says Jane was aged 86 and born in Wherwell, Hants; however, the 1851 census says she was 61 and born in what looks like Horrell, Hants. This could make her born in 1775 or 1790. As she married in 1807, the latter is only slightly implausible; the former makes her 54 when Joseph was born which is impossible. Based on when her children were born, a birth in the 1780s seems most likely.
-
Sources - [S14] Hampshire Marriage Index, 1754–1837, Hampshire Genealogical Society.
- [S14] Hampshire Marriage Index, 1754–1837, Hampshire Genealogical Society.